
Amazon Textract is AWS’s machine studying service that reads and processes paperwork routinely. It does extra than simply flip photographs into textual content like fundamental OCR instruments. You need to use it to tug information from varieties and tables, course of each typed and handwritten textual content, work with PDFs and scanned photographs, and deal with multilingual doc processing. It even comes with ready-to-use instruments for particular paperwork like invoices, IDs, and lending paperwork.
Our evaluation of real-world implementations revealed Textract’s clear strengths and limitations. It excels at processing structured monetary paperwork and varieties inside the AWS ecosystem. The pricing begins at $1.50 per 1,000 pages for fundamental textual content extraction, scaling up for specialised doc sorts like invoices or lending paperwork. However, he platform falls brief in the case of:
➡️
1. Accuracy when processing handwritten textual content
2. Prices that scale poorly for giant volumes
3. Advanced doc layouts and non-standard formatting
4. Desk extraction with superior formatting
5. Setup requiring AWS experience and ongoing upkeep
Let’s take a look at the highest Textract options that will help you choose the precise instrument on your doc processing wants.
A quick comparability of Amazon Textract options
Sr No. | Product | Essential characteristic | G2 ranking | Free trial | Pricing | Complete rating* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Amazon Textract | AWS-native doc processing | 4.4/5 | No | Pay-as-you-go ($1.50 per 1,000 pages) | 43.4 |
2 | Nanonets | Finish-to-end automation with 98% accuracy | 4.8/5 | Sure (500 pages) | Pay-as-you-go, First 500 pages free | 46.5 |
3 | Rossum | Cognitive information seize | 4.4/5 | No | Customized pricing | 43.8 |
4 | Docparser | Rule-based extraction | 4.6/5 | Sure | Begins at $39/month | 44.0 |
5 | Azure DI | Enterprise integration | 4.5/5 | Sure | Pay-as-you-go | 43.2 |
6 | Google Cloud Doc AI | ML-powered processing | 4.2/5 | Sure | Pay-as-you-go | 43.2 |
7 | ABBYY FlexiCapture | Superior OCR capabilities | 4.1/5 | No | Begins at $4,150 (one-time) | 44.3 |
8 | Tungsten Seize | Excessive-volume doc scanning | 4.3/5 | Sure | Customized pricing | 43.0 |
9 | Laserfiche | Enterprise content material administration | 4.7/5 | Sure | Begins at $50/person/yr | 43.9 |
10 | Hyperscience | Human-in-loop workflows | 4.6/5 | No | Customized pricing | 46.3 |
(*Confer with scoring methodology on the backside)
Now, let’s look at every different intimately to grasp their particular strengths, limitations, and ideally suited use circumstances. We’ll analyze how they examine to Textract and enable you decide which answer most closely fits your doc processing wants.
1. Nanonets
Nanonets is an AI based mostly doc processing platform that goes past fundamental OCR to offer end-to-end automation. In contrast to Textract’s template-based strategy, we use deep studying to grasp doc context and adapt to new layouts routinely. Our platform combines OCR, pure language processing, and machine studying to deal with every little thing from information extraction to workflow automation.
💡
Key options:
1. Clever doc classification and routing
2. Automated information validation and error checking
3. Customized mannequin coaching with as few as 10 samples
4. Pre-built fashions for invoices, receipts, IDs
5. Multi-stage approval workflows
6. Database matching for information verification
7. Automated export to accounting methods
8. Webhook and API integrations
9. Constructed-in human verification instruments
Professionals of Nanonets | Cons of Nanonets |
---|---|
Template-free processing with self-learning fashions | Larger value for low volumes |
Helps 40+ languages | UI will be overwhelming at first |
Pre-trained fashions for frequent paperwork | Studying curve for complicated workflows |
Intensive integration capabilities | |
Sturdy workflow automation capabilities | |
Constructed-in verification and approval flows | |
Sturdy API documentation and assist | |
Common mannequin enhancements from corrections |
Pricing: Free tier out there for first 500 pages. Professional plan begins at $999/month for 10,000 pages.
Greatest suited to: Mid to giant organizations in finance, healthcare, logistics, and manufacturing sectors processing various doc sorts.
How does Nanonets examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Nanonets |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
9.3 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
9.1 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
9.4 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.1 |
8.8 |
Product Route (% optimistic) |
9.6 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Nanonet when you’re on the lookout for self-learning fashions, intensive workflow automation, and built-in verification instruments to automate your doc processing workflow end-to-end. Nanonets may help you deal with various doc layouts and a number of languages or guarantee seamless information movement together with your current enterprise methods.
2. Rossum

Rossum’s strategy to doc processing includes utilizing cognitive information seize as a substitute of conventional template-based extraction. The platform combines AI-powered understanding with intensive workflow automation to deal with your entire doc lifecycle – from receiving to processing to integration with enterprise methods.
Learn About: Rossum Alternate options and Rivals
💡
Key options:
1. Cognitive information seize with out templates
2. Multi-channel doc receiving
3. Constructed-in exception dealing with workflow
4. Intensive validation guidelines engine
5. Enterprise-grade integrations
6. Customized area validation
7. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 licensed
8. Two-way communication for exceptions
Professionals of Rossum | Cons of Rossum |
---|---|
No templates wanted for brand new layouts | Larger value for low volumes |
Higher dealing with of complicated paperwork | System glitches throughout updates |
Sturdy enterprise-grade assist | Slower processing of huge PDFs |
Constructed-in exception administration | Steeper studying curve initially |
Intensive validation capabilities | Advanced API for tax constructions |
Common AI enhancements | Restricted Excel assist |
Versatile customization choices | |
Sturdy safety compliance |
Pricing: Enterprise-focused pricing with customized quotes based mostly on quantity. Consists of SLA ensures and devoted assist.
Greatest suited to: Organizations throughout manufacturing, retail, and monetary companies that want complete doc automation. Rossum notably excels in AP departments and shared service facilities processing various vendor paperwork.
How does Rossum examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Rossum |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.5 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
9.2 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.3 |
8.8 |
Product Route (% optimistic) |
9.8 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Rossum if that you must course of various doc sorts with sturdy validation and compliance controls. The platform notably shines in accounts payable automation and vendor doc processing the place template upkeep could be impractical.
3. Docparser

Docparser gives a rule-based strategy utilizing zonal OCR expertise. Whereas Textract makes use of machine studying to grasp paperwork, Docparser helps you to outline precisely how and the place to extract information utilizing customizable parsing guidelines.
💡
Key options:
1. Customizable zonal OCR extraction
2. Superior desk parsing capabilities
3. Good doc routing system
4. Pre-built parsing templates
5. Automated information formatting
6. Multi-format doc assist
7. Intensive API entry
Professionals of Docparser | Cons of Docparser |
---|---|
Extra exact extraction management | Requires handbook rule setup |
Higher with constant layouts | Restricted AI capabilities |
Stronger desk extraction | Studying curve for setup |
Extra inexpensive for low volumes | One language at a time |
Easier integration choices | Template upkeep wanted |
Fast processing pace | Not ideally suited for diverse layouts |
Glorious buyer assist | |
Clear pricing construction |
Pricing: Clear tiered pricing beginning at $39/month for 100 paperwork. Marketing strategy at $159/month for 1,000 paperwork. Enterprise plans out there.
Greatest suited to: Small to mid-sized companies processing constant doc codecs, particularly in finance and operations.
How does Docparser examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Docparser |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
9.0 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.8 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.9 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.7 |
8.8 |
Product Route (% optimistic) |
8.5 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Docparser when you want granular management over extraction guidelines and work primarily with structured paperwork. Its rule-based strategy makes it ideally suited for automated workflows the place paperwork have predictable codecs and also you want exact desk extraction. The platform gives higher worth for smaller doc volumes and offers extra easy integration choices.
4. Azure AI Doc Intelligence

Azure AI Doc Intelligence is a part of Microsoft’s cloud platform, Azure, which offers over 200 cloud companies for companies. It represents Microsoft’s enterprise-focused strategy to doc processing, providing processing capabilities that run each within the cloud and by yourself servers. You possibly can deploy it by containers that fit your particular information storage and processing location necessities.
💡
Key options:
1. Basic doc evaluation (learn/format)
2. Pre-built enterprise doc fashions
3. Customized neural mannequin coaching
4. Doc classification
5. Container-based deployment
6. Azure service integration
7. Constructed-in validation guidelines
8. Multi-language assist
9. Human evaluation workflows
Professionals of Azure DI | Cons of Azure DI |
---|---|
On-premises deployment possibility | Advanced preliminary configuration |
Pre-built enterprise fashions | Requires technical experience |
Sturdy Azure integration | Studying curve for superior options |
Customized neural fashions | Updates may cause disruptions |
Doc classification | Value administration complexity |
Container assist | Documentation gaps |
Enterprise safety | |
A number of deployment decisions |
Pricing: Pay-as-you-go based mostly on pages processed. Free tier contains 500 pages month-to-month. Enterprise pricing out there for prime volumes.
Greatest suited to: Enterprises throughout healthcare, finance, and authorities sectors that must course of paperwork within the cloud and on their servers.
How does Azure Kind Recognizer examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Azure DI |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.5 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.5 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.0 |
8.8 |
Product Route (% optimistic) |
9.2 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Azure Doc Intelligence whenever you want extra management over the place your doc processing occurs. It might even be a sensible choice when you already use Microsoft companies.
5. Google Cloud Doc AI

Doc AI represents Google’s enterprise strategy to doc processing. A part of the corporate’s cloud division, it combines OCR, pure language processing, and machine studying to remodel unstructured paperwork into actionable information. It offers an end-to-end platform for doc processing, evaluation, and storage.
💡
Key options:
1. Basic doc processors (OCR, splitter, parser)
2. Pre-built enterprise processors
3. Doc AI Workbench for customized fashions
4. Doc AI Warehouse for storage
5. Human-in-loop evaluation capabilities
6. Built-in processing console
7. Multi-language assist
8. Batch processing limitations
9. API-first structure
Professionals of Doc AI | Cons of Doc AI |
---|---|
Intensive pre-built processors | Restricted batch processing |
Sturdy ML/AI capabilities | Advanced pricing construction |
Built-in storage answer | Requires technical experience |
Human evaluation workflows | Larger studying curve |
Google Cloud integration | Enterprise-focused pricing |
Common mannequin enhancements | Documentation gaps |
Sturdy OCR accuracy | |
Versatile deployment |
Pricing: Pay-as-you-go based mostly on doc processing quantity. Free tier out there for testing. Enterprise pricing out there for prime volumes.
Greatest suited to: Enterprises processing various doc sorts at scale, particularly people who require complicated evaluation. If an integration with Google Cloud is smart to what you are promoting.
How does Google Cloud Doc AI examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Google Cloud Doc AI |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.7 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.5 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.0 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.8 |
8.8 |
Product Route (% optimistic) |
9.2 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Doc AI if what you are promoting wants highly effective ML/AI capabilities and pre-built for complicated doc processing wants. Nevertheless, do word that its enterprise focus could also be overkill for less complicated use circumstances. It really works nicely whenever you want sturdy OCR capabilities mixed with doc storage and search.
6. ABBYY FlexiCapture

ABBYY FlexiCapture is a robust clever doc processing platform that automates the seize, classification, and information extraction from all kinds of doc sorts and codecs. In contrast to Textract’s cloud-only mannequin, FlexiCapture gives each on-premises and cloud deployment choices, making it appropriate for organizations with strict information safety and compliance necessities.
Learn Extra: ABBYY FlexiCapture Alternate options and Rivals
💡
Key options:
1. Superior OCR for structured and unstructured paperwork
2. AI-based information seize and extraction
3. Clever doc classification and separation
4. Scalable batch processing for prime volumes
5. Customizable enterprise guidelines and validation
6. Multi-channel enter (scanner, e mail, fax, cellular)
7. Seamless integration with BPM, RPA, and ECM methods
8. Versatile deployment choices (on-premises, cloud, hybrid)
9. Multi-language assist
Professionals of FlexiCapture | Cons of FlexiCapture |
---|---|
Extremely correct information extraction | Advanced setup and configuration |
Handles various doc codecs | Steep studying curve |
Scalable for high-volume processing | Larger upfront funding |
Sturdy integration capabilities | Requires specialised IT abilities to take care of |
Versatile deployment choices | |
Sturdy compliance and safety features |
Pricing: Primarily based on the variety of pages processed yearly, with the price per web page reducing as quantity will increase. On-premises and cloud-based pricing fashions can be found, with on-premises requiring the next upfront funding however decrease ongoing prices. Precise pricing just isn’t publicly disclosed.
Greatest suited to: Enterprises and organizations with high-volume doc processing wants and strict compliance necessities, like healthcare, finance, and authorities.
How does ABBYY FlexiCapture examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
ABBYY FlexiCapture |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.8 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.5 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.0 |
8.8 |
Product Route (% optimistic) |
10.0 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select FlexiCapture when you want enterprise-grade doc processing with sturdy batch capabilities and versatile deployment choices. The platform notably shines when processing excessive volumes of complicated paperwork with strict compliance necessities.
7. Tungsten Seize (previously Kofax Seize)

Tungsten Seize is a doc scanning and information extraction answer that automates the conversion of paper paperwork into digital information. It focuses on high-volume doc scanning, OCR, and information seize.
Learn About: Kofax Alternate options and Rivals
💡
Key options:
1. Superior doc scanning and picture processing
2. Clever doc separation and classification
3. Automated information extraction utilizing OCR and ICR
4. VRS (VirtualReScan) expertise for picture enhancement
5. Integration with different Tungsten Modules for superior information extraction
6. Help for a variety of scanners and multi-function gadgets
7. Scalable structure for high-volume processing
8. Batch processing and workflow automation capabilities
9. Centralized administration and monitoring
Professionals of Tungsten Seize | Cons of Tungsten Seize |
---|---|
Extremely correct OCR and information extraction | Advanced setup and configuration |
Handles various doc sorts and codecs | Steep studying curve |
Highly effective picture enhancement with VRS | Larger upfront prices |
Scalable for high-volume processing | Requires on-premises infrastructure |
Intensive customization choices | Restricted out-of-the-box integrations |
Mature and confirmed expertise | Older person interface design |
Pricing: Pricing relies on the variety of pages scanned yearly, with quantity reductions out there. Further prices could apply for add-on modules, skilled companies, and upkeep. Precise pricing just isn’t publicly disclosed, however it usually includes a big upfront funding and ongoing upkeep charges.
Greatest suited to: Organizations with high-volume, centralized doc scanning necessities, akin to shared service facilities, BPOs, and enormous enterprises with devoted scanning departments.
How does Tungsten Seize examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Tungsten Seize |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.5 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.7 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
8.8 |
8.8 |
Product Route (% optimistic) |
9.0 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Tungsten Seize when you want a sturdy, on-premises answer for high-volume doc scanning and information extraction. Its superior picture processing, batch scanning capabilities, and intensive customization choices make it appropriate for complicated doc seize wants and current infrastructure.
8. Laserfiche

Laserfiche is a complete enterprise content material administration (ECM) and enterprise course of automation platform that features strong doc seize and processing capabilities. It gives an end-to-end answer that mixes clever doc seize, safe storage, workflow automation, and data administration.
💡
Key options:
1. Clever doc seize and classification
2. Workflow designer for course of automation
3. Digital varieties and digital signatures
4. Doc administration and model management
5. Data administration and retention insurance policies
6. Safe doc storage and entry management
7. Cell doc seize and entry
8. Varied integration choices and APIs
Professionals | Cons |
---|---|
Complete content material administration | Larger upfront prices |
Highly effective workflow automation | Steeper studying curve |
Sturdy safety and compliance | Requires IT sources to implement and preserve |
Extremely customizable and extensible | Could require skilled companies for complicated implementations |
Scalable for enterprise deployments | |
Deep integration with enterprise methods |
Pricing: Gives each on-premises and cloud-based deployment choices, with pricing based mostly on the variety of customers and particular modules required. You will get a free trial for its cloud-based answer.
Greatest suited to: Organizations throughout industries, notably these with complicated doc administration and compliance necessities, akin to authorities businesses, instructional establishments, monetary companies companies, and healthcare suppliers.
How does Laserfiche examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Laserfiche |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
8.8 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
8.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
8.9 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.0 |
8.8 |
Product Route (% optimistic) |
9.2 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Laserfiche when you want a complete answer that mixes doc processing with doc administration, workflow automation, and data administration. It is notably priceless whenever you want sturdy safety, compliance, and auditing capabilities alongside doc seize.
9. Hyperscience

Hyperscience is an clever doc processing platform that mixes AI, ML, and human-in-the-loop workflows to automate information extraction, classification, and validation. It gives an end-to-end answer that handles complicated, variable, and low-quality paperwork with excessive accuracy and automation charges.
Learn About: Hyperscience Alternate options and Rivals
💡
Key options:
1. AI-powered information extraction and classification
2. Help for structured, semi-structured, and unstructured paperwork
3. ICR for handwritten textual content and low-quality photographs
4. Human-in-the-loop workflows for exception dealing with and validation
5. Customizable workflows and integration with current methods
6. Steady studying and mannequin enchancment
7. Safe and compliant infrastructure
Professionals of Hyperscience | Cons of Hyperscience |
---|---|
Excessive accuracy and automation charges | Larger value in comparison with standalone options |
Handles complicated, variable, and low-quality paperwork | Longer preliminary setup and configuration |
Human-in-the-loop workflows for exception dealing with | Could require important coaching information for customized fashions |
Integration with enterprise methods | |
Steady studying and enchancment | |
Devoted buyer success group and assist |
Pricing: Gives customized pricing.
Greatest suited to: Enterprises with complicated, high-volume doc processing wants, notably these coping with variable, unstructured, or low-quality paperwork. Industries akin to monetary companies, insurance coverage, healthcare, and authorities might be able to automate claims processing, account opening, and bill processing, with excessive accuracy and effectivity.
How does Hyperscience examine to Amazon Textract?
Parameter |
Hyperscience |
Amazon Textract |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use |
9.3 |
8.9 |
Ease of Setup |
9.0 |
8.9 |
High quality of Help |
9.1 |
8.6 |
Meets Necessities |
9.1 |
8.8 |
Product Route (% optimistic) |
9.8 |
8.2 |
➡️
Our take: Select Hyperscience when that you must automate complicated, high-stakes processes or in case your use-case includes processing all kinds of doc sorts. It might embrace handwritten varieties, low-quality scans, or unstructured information.
How to decide on the perfect Amazon Textract different?
At Nanonets, we course of hundreds of thousands of paperwork month-to-month for over 500 enterprises, together with 35% of Fortune 500 firms. This provides us distinctive insights into what works (and what would not) in doc processing. We have seen firsthand how companies battle to search out the precise doc processing answer, particularly when evaluating Amazon Textract options.
For the aim of this comparability, we evaluated Textract options based mostly on:
- Actual efficiency information from processing hundreds of thousands of paperwork
- Direct suggestions from enterprise purchasers who switched platforms
- Unbiased person opinions from G2, Capterra, Gartner, and TrustRadius
- Palms-on testing by our doc processing specialists
Scoring methodology*
We have evaluated every different throughout 5 key parameters that matter most to organizations switching from Textract:
- Ease of use: How rapidly groups can begin utilizing the instrument with out intensive AWS experience
- Ease of setup: Implementation effort, particularly in comparison with Textract’s AWS-centric setup
- High quality of assist: Availability and responsiveness of assist, a standard ache level with Textract
- Meets necessities: Potential to deal with doc processing wants past Textract’s capabilities
- Product course: Steady enchancment and have growth tempo
Product | Ease of Use | Ease of Setup | High quality of Help | Meets Necessities | Product Route | Complete Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon Textract | 8.9 | 8.9 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.2 | 43.4 |
Nanonets | 9.3 | 9.1 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 46.5 |
Rossum | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.2 | 8.3 | 9.8 | 43.8 |
Docparser | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.9 | 8.7 | 8.5 | 44.0 |
Azure DI | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.2 |
Google Cloud Doc AI | 8.7 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.8 | 9.2 | 43.2 |
ABBYY FlexiCapture | 8.8 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 44.3 |
Tungsten Seize | 8.5 | 8.0 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 9.0 | 43.0 |
Laserfiche | 8.8 | 8.0 | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.9 |
Hyperscience | 9.3 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 46.3 |
Key determination elements
Primarily based on frequent challenges organizations face with Textract, contemplate these features:
Doc complexity necessities
- Do you want higher handwriting recognition than Textract gives?
- Are you processing complicated tables or varieties?
- Do that you must deal with a number of languages successfully?
AWS dependency issues
- How tightly built-in are you with AWS companies?
- Would a cloud-agnostic answer provide extra flexibility?
- Do you want on-premises deployment choices?
Value construction preferences
- Is Textract’s per-page pricing mannequin working on your quantity?
- Do you want extra predictable pricing?
- What’s your month-to-month doc processing quantity?
Integration wants
- Past AWS companies, what methods want to attach?
- Do you want pre-built connectors to frequent enterprise instruments?
- How essential is API flexibility?
Automation necessities
- Do you want workflow automation capabilities?
- Is batch processing essential on your use case?
- Do you require human-in-the-loop options?
💡
– Function units and capabilities could have modified
– Pricing fashions would possibly differ from what’s listed
– Efficiency metrics might range based mostly in your particular use case
– Integration choices could have expanded
– New options could have been added
We advocate reaching out to distributors instantly for essentially the most present data and testing any answer totally together with your precise paperwork earlier than making a call.
Whereas business options provide complete options and assist, organizations with technical sources or monetary constrainst might also contemplate open-source options for doc processing.
Tesseract OCR, maintained by Google, is likely one of the most established open-source OCR engines out there. Another choice is EasyOCR, which gives a Python library for OCR with assist for handwriting recognition and a number of languages.
Nevertheless, not like the business options mentioned above, open-source options usually require important technical experience to implement and preserve and sometimes want extra growth work to match options like kind area extraction, desk evaluation, and workflow automation that come customary with business platforms.
FAQs
What’s the distinction between ABBYY and Textract?
ABBYY FlexiCapture is a complete doc processing platform that features superior OCR, workflow automation, and enterprise integration capabilities. It gives each cloud and on-premises deployment choices. Amazon Textract, compared, is a cloud-only service targeted particularly on information extraction and doc evaluation, built-in with AWS companies.
What’s the distinction between OCR and Textract?
OCR (Optical Character Recognition) is a expertise that converts photographs of textual content into machine-readable textual content. Amazon Textract goes past fundamental OCR through the use of machine studying to not solely acknowledge textual content but additionally perceive doc construction, extract kind fields, and analyze tables routinely. Whereas OCR merely converts textual content, Textract offers structured information output and understanding of doc relationships.
Amazon Textract is a machine studying service that routinely extracts textual content, handwriting, and information from scanned paperwork. It is a part of AWS’s AI companies, designed to course of paperwork at scale with out handbook intervention. The service can establish and extract information from varieties and tables whereas sustaining the unique doc’s construction and relationships.
Can Textract extract photographs?
Textract processes photographs to extract textual content and information from them, however it would not extract photographs themselves. It will possibly analyze photographs containing paperwork, varieties, tables, and handwritten textual content, however its objective is to extract textual data and information relatively than picture content material.